中國(guó)的住宅標(biāo)識(shí)設(shè)計(jì)文化觀念融入占主導(dǎo)地位的國(guó)家

中國(guó)的標(biāo)識(shí)設(shè)計(jì)文化多樣性視為一種有少數(shù)群體提出的一種他者的術(shù)語，而是佳琪視為公共空間必不可少的組成部分，其實(shí)，多樣性概念的提出，不是讓人們努力實(shí)現(xiàn)差異的去種族化，而是不自覺地?cái)U(kuò)大了差異性的范圍，加性別年齡取向是否等條目納入討論范圍之中，最后都要新的住宅概念了，人們可以開到差異的復(fù)雜性，拋開問題，表象差異，不再成為需要被同化被解決的問題，而是成為住宅公共文化空氣的積極資源，換句話說，他差異性變得有效了。21世紀(jì)，來哉。可以開拓，是多樣性取得了少數(shù)群體的。重要標(biāo)志之一。從傳統(tǒng)的角度看，與少數(shù)群體相關(guān)的議題和政治事務(wù)，往往是在嚴(yán)格的背景下解決的，解決方法，幾乎是根據(jù)該國(guó)少數(shù)群體和多數(shù)群體的關(guān)系來決定的，舉個(gè)例子，如果少數(shù)群體都是自己的文化，需要被國(guó)家承認(rèn)。

會(huì)實(shí)行一種大多數(shù)群體包容少數(shù)群體的文化和社會(huì)政策，這么做的結(jié)果通常是少數(shù)群體的中國(guó)的標(biāo)識(shí)設(shè)計(jì)文化觀念融入占主導(dǎo)地位的國(guó)家文化社會(huì)秩序中。從這一視角來看，少數(shù)群的問題就被基本解決了，比如在美術(shù)館里四人設(shè)立。少數(shù)民族藝術(shù)展廳等看上去是對(duì)少數(shù)文化的包容，在設(shè)計(jì)一種同質(zhì)化的表面的解決方法，不僅如此在21世紀(jì)以來，自動(dòng)整合主義方式的困難局限性已經(jīng)開始。愈發(fā)妥，現(xiàn)在不斷珍藏的。移民文化的轉(zhuǎn)變，少數(shù)群體的問題已經(jīng)跳脫到國(guó)家參考范圍之內(nèi)，開始會(huì)當(dāng)作多樣性那種。我在參考了。我們剛從同志走下多樣，另一個(gè)需要著重探討的問題就是公民身份的改變，這些決定了在公共。空間的美術(shù)館中，中國(guó)的住宅標(biāo)識(shí)設(shè)計(jì)公共對(duì)概念的成那范圍公民身份代表了一個(gè)自然人在社會(huì)中的成分，把形形色色的人帶入到一個(gè)政治共同體中。

China's logo design culture concept is integrated into the dominant country

The cultural diversity of Chinese logo design is regarded as a term of the other proposed by minority groups, but Jiaqi regards it as an indispensable part of public space. In fact, the concept of diversity is not to make people work hard. To achieve the de-racialization of differences, but to unconsciously expand the scope of differences, whether to add gender and age orientation and other items into the scope of discussion, finally a new concept, people can explore the complexity of differences, throw away Opening problems and differences in appearance no longer become problems that need to be assimilated and solved, but become a positive resource for public cultural air. In other words, their differences become effective. The 21st century is here. It can be exploited, but diversity has achieved the minority. One of the important signs. From a traditional perspective, issues and political affairs related to minorities are often resolved in a strict context. The solution is almost determined based on the relationship between the minority and the majority in the country. For example, if Minorities have their own culture and need to be recognized by the state.

A cultural and social policy that allows the majority to accommodate the minorities will be implemented. The result of this is usually that the minority groups’ Chinese logo design cultural concepts are integrated into the dominant national cultural and social order. From this perspective, the problem of minority groups has been basically solved, such as setting up four people in an art gallery. Minority art exhibition halls, etc., seem to be tolerant of minority cultures. They are designing a homogenous surface solution. Not only that, since the 21st century, the difficult limitations of automatic integrationism have begun. It's getting better and better, and now it's constantly being collected. With the change of immigration culture, the problem of minority groups has escaped from the scope of national reference, and began to be regarded as the kind of diversity. I'm referencing it. We have just stepped down from being gay. Another issue that needs to be discussed is the change of citizenship. These decisions are in the public. In the art gallery of the space, the scope of Chinese logo design and the concept of public citizenship represents a natural person's component in society, bringing all kinds of people into a political community.